Admit and solve a problem or deny and ignore it?

Climate change is a big problem, of which we gladly talk, endlessly. And yet we choose not to even consider any such solution models that would eke out any meaningful significance in actually solving the problem. This is the case, as we know and fear, that the implementation of these actions would end up bringing more negative than positive things to our personal, materialistic lives. That is, in the short run, our own brief lives. We don’t want to be the person to put on the cloak of suffering, at least not today. What about the cloak of uncomfortability? A hard workout at the gym simply will not suffice. Aren’t we the masters of the noble art of procrastination!? This is vidtoolz signing out by asking you to regularly step out of your own comfort zone. You have good one!

Video editing, NLE & post production options

As a video editor, you really have four options at the moment to choose from: Premiere Pro – Final Cut Pro – Sony Vegas Pro – and Avid Media Composer. Why only four? The short answer is that the others have a lack of sufficient user base. This means that the probability of a random google search finding your random problem and it’s solution concerning the video editor, is too low. Google is a usable technical support, but only if the user base is sufficiently high. Another thing is that you don’t want to become an expert on a software that is going to cease to exist in five years so you have to find out the condition of the company too.

Ministry of truth

“YouTube will add information from Wikipedia to videos about popular conspiracy theories to provide alternative viewpoints on controversial subjects, its CEO said today. YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki said that these text boxes, which the company is calling “information cues,” would begin appearing on conspiracy-related videos within the next couple of weeks.” Continue reading “Ministry of truth”

Of interesting wants and relevant needs

It’s not about how good or bad your content is – it much more about the algorithm, it will give your following multiple times more than the quality of your content ever will. Maybe I’m just backwards, anti-change, anti “new things” but I can’t help think that is fundamentally wrong. It is truly not the humans steering the ship, but the algorithm. It is obvious that this is not the natural, organic way. Should it be? The true crime is that if you’re not even aware of this, when you could and should be. More discussion is needed. Away from the Kardashians. Continue reading “Of interesting wants and relevant needs”